Home Intro
Bulletin Board
Tasting Notes
Articles
Best Buys
Search
Contact
Philadelphia
Wine Wine
Books
Wine Quotes
Events
Basics
Links
Photos
Kudos
Wine audio
TM
Tasting
Notes
January/February, 2009
![]()
![]()
QPR Winner I give this award to wines that
demonstrate an excellent Quality to Price Ratio. They are sometimes more
expensive than the wines featured in my
Best Buys section (which is cut
off at $20), so while every Best Buy is also a QPR Winner, not every QPR
winner is an official Best Buy. QPR winners are simply wines that are
great values for a relatively reasonable
price.
Alsace
Burgundy
Calif/USA
Dessert/Sparkling
Germany
Rhone/S/SW France
Spain
Alsace
(except
dessert/sparkling)
2002 Riesling "Schlossberg" (Paul Blanck)
Since my last taste, this has come along very well. If never quite a distinguished wine, it remains lively and flavorful, beautifully balanced and just slightly off-dry, enough to make it neither steely nor austere. It seems to be drinking well at the moment, round and caressing on the palate. 89 points.
1990 Riesling "Frederic Emile" (Trimbach)
This didn't seem old on opening, but it was consumed with acidity and
little else, a touch lactic. It was hard to find the thinning fruit. Some warmth
and air revived this wine, as the fruit came back. Although the wine retained a
mouthwatering, high acid finish, it had better balance and showed surprising
freshness for a wine of its age. Its color was relatively light and the bottle
seemed remarkably young for a 1990. This is a pretty nice performance if you
like them on the austere, steely side. 90 points.
2004 Pinot Gris "Clos Windsbuhl" (Zind-Humbrecht)
Not surprisingly very ripe, this is clearly a late harvest wine. More
surprisingly, however, it is a wine that has restrained sugar levels, at least
as perceptible. The color is dark and it has a touch of that apricot and mango
one gets with very late harvest wines, but it is dry enough to still be useable
as a table wine. It is neither particularly lush nor unctuous. It is an
interesting wine with its many contradictions. It is ready to drink. 89 points.
Burgundy
(except
dessert/sparkling)
1996 Mazis-Chambertin "Cuvée A" (Dominique Laurent)
Bright, elegant and lively, this shows some age in the form of a little
earthiness, some forest floor around the edges. The acidity is high,
though--a bit too high--and keeps it youthful and energetic. The finish is
austere and mouthwatering, the fruit rather overwhelmed by the acidity. For
all those who seem to obsess on oak and Laurent, there are no oak issues
with this wine. In fact, in many respects it is too typical of the opposite
Burgundy style, light and tart. 88 points.
California/USA
(except
dessert/sparkling)
2000 Pinot Noir "Marcassin Vineyard" (Marcassin)
The good news
with this wine at this point in its life is that it is youthful and sweet.
The bad news is that it is simple, relatively unstructured and a bit candied
on the finish. The depth is modest, appropriate for Pinot Noir, though, and
it tastes reasonably good, but it always has a middle of the road, rather
simple feel to it, giving one a sense that it is going nowhere and will
develop into nothing interesting or complex. 88 points
2001
Cabernet Sauvignon "Eisele" (Araujo)
This elegant
wine is graceful, but the oak overlay gives the fruit a sort of licorice note
that I found a little annoying. It never seemed terribly complex as it aired
out, nor particularly intense, making me wonder where this relatively young wine
from a powerful vintage is going. This certainly does a lot right in its
soft, sexy, suave demeanor, but I was expecting something a bit more even so.
Perhaps it is in an awkward stage. 93 points.
2001
Cabernet Sauvignon "RBS Beckstoffer To-Kalon Vineyard" (Schrader)
Nicely
focused, with modest depth, this has a debonair feel to it and is quite tasty,
with a Burgundian feel. It does seem to have thinned with just a few years of
age. It is easy drinking, but for its price tag, I might have hoped for a
little more, something with a bit more flesh and a bit more promise for the
future. 90 points.
2003 Cariad (Colgin)
Ripe, with a touch of
herbs on the finish, this initially shows perfectly, with a burst of tannin and
little intensity and backbone that should serve the wine well as it ages. As it
aired out, I did think the alcohol showed a bit, but this is otherwise a
beautifully constructed wine from a big vintage. 93 points.
2001 Pinot Noir “Cuvée Catherine" (Kistler)
This lovely Pinot has an elegant mid-palate and perfect balance, soft
texture, with just enough acidity on the edges. The wine's best feature, though,
is plainly its intensity of flavor, a persistent black cherry nuance that lasts
and is simply delicious from first sip to last. It is elegant, but sexy at the
same time. 94 points.
2005 Pinot Noir "Special Reserve Edna Valley" (Herzog)
Light in color with little depth and concentration, this simple wine has
little finish or structure. The flavors are muted at first, but when fruit does
appear, it is friendly enough, if simple and one dimensional. At $30, this very
basic wine, little more than a jug wine, is inoffensive, but seems quite
expensive for what it is. This is Kosher, non Mevushal. 80 points.
2003 Syrah Special Reserve Edna Valley" (Herzog)
The Syrah ($30) from Herzog is a considerable step up on the Pinot Noir
reviewed on this page, largely because of its structure. At age 6, it is still
rather intense and tight on the finish, the tannins showing some grip. The depth
is modest, though. The fruit is tasty, although rather simple at the outset, but
it does show far more character and Syrah typicity with air. This wine lacks the depth of
fruit necessary to be truly distinguished, turning rather austere as it airs
out, the tannins outliving and somewhat dominating the fruit, but it has some
good points. It's not for the shy though--there is no round, fruity little wine
here. Although the tannins suggest that holding this wine longer is necessary, I
suspect that the current impression of lack of balance in the wine will not be cured with long
cellaring and it will become less rather than more attractive.
Still, I rather enjoyed this at times, particularly as the fruit developed
some character with air. It definitely needs some food. This is Kosher, non Mevushal.
86 points.
2005 Cabernet Sauvignon "Special Reserve Napa Valley" (Herzog)
This Cabernet ($39) has a bit of a vanilla tinge (17 months in oak), but it
integrates surprisingly well. The structure here is rather good, the wine having
some backbone, as well as a bright, lively feel. The principal problem--it's
vegetal. The green nuances are a bit much, and unless you are a big fan of cool
climate Cab Franc, this Cabernet Sauvignon may seem too herbaceous. It flattens
out a bit with air, too, but it has its moments. Still, there is no reason a
Napa Cab should be quite this green.
This is Kosher, non Mevushal.
84 points.
1992 Cabernet Sauvignon "Herb Lamb" (Colgin)
Double decanted from magnum, this opened with a nose that made it seem
rather old and somewhat over the hill, but that was deceptive. While it always
showed tertiary aromas and full maturity, this came along beautifully. The musty
notes on the nose, bottle stink no doubt, blew off, and the wine developed into
a charming and complex Bordeaux-ringer with a bright, succulent finish and fine
flavor. The mid-palate is elegant at best at this point in its life, but there
is a lot here to like. I suspect this won't show quite as well from 750ml. 93
points.
1994 Cabernet Sauvignon (Harlan)
Haven't had this in awhile, and certainly not from magnum. It is certainly
even better than my last bottle (from 750ml), seeming younger and more vital.
Despite being double decanted, this was better 90 minutes after opening from the
glass than it was on pouring. The wine has some complexity and elegance, but it
was remarkable watching the fruit get riper and sweeter, in perfect balance with
its sweet tannins. The red fruit notes are simply delicious, yet everything is
in a perfect place, harmonious and graceful, with some minerality, too. This
continues to be one of my favorite wines from an era that produced a lot of
them. 100 points.
1997 Cabernet Sauvignon Estate (Chateau Montelena)
Placed next to a lot of pricey cults, this wine nearly stole the show. It is
certainly one of the great '97s, and unlike the vintage's stereotype it has
great structure, penetration and a serious backbone, along with an earthy, lead
pencil demeanor on the finish and ripe, gorgeous fruit. As this airs out, it
remains pointed, but becomes more graceful. It is a very fine Cabernet that has
years to go in the cellar. Having had this from 750ml not long ago, I can say
the main difference here is a little more intensity. Both incarnations were
terrific. 96 points.
1993 Cabernet Sauvignon "Eisele" (Araujo)
Well, perhaps this wine was ill served being poured next to the Colgin,
Montelena and Harlan on this page. Still, a creature of its vintage, it was
uninspiring. The mid-palate has thinned considerably and there are tertiary
notes around the edges. It does not seem complex, as the Colgin does, however,
merely aging and stolid, just there, hardly distinguished at this point in its
life, but still pleasant enough. 89 points.
1998 Petite Sirah "Rattlesnake Acres" (Turley)
This lovely PS has come along brilliantly from this challenging vintage. It
is drinking perfectly now. Open for hours, it showed its best at the end,
the fruit becoming sweeter and finish bright and succulent. The elegant
mid-palate is graceful, but by no means wimpy. This is beautifully balanced,
with well integrated tannins, and simply delicious. 92 points.
1998 Petite Sirah "Barcini Vineyard" (Behrens & Hitchcock)
This wine, overbearing in its youth due to the oak, has had a bit of an
epiphany. Oh, the oak is still obvious, giving it a bit of that caramel edge
on the finish, but it has integrated considerably, too. With age, the
mid-palate has thinned, giving the wine a more elegant air. The fruit is by
no means dead or dying, though, still producing flavor, even if the
mid-palate concentration is average at best. There is still a lot to like
here, particularly considering that it was a fairly early performance from a
difficult vintage. This had a synthetic cork, and there were issues
concerning how the wine aged with the cork. I found no issue in particular
here. 89 points.
2006 Grenache "Estate" (Clos LaChance)
This and the next few wines represent this relatively young Central Coast
winery's entry into Rhone grapes. I rather like their Rhone performance and
potential a bit better than the Bordeaux varietals. I liked this pure
Grenache better than the Lila blend, reviewed below. This is a bit tight and
intense on opening, longer on the finish and with more intensity of flavor
as well as structure. The ripe Grenache throws off some rhubarb nuances, and
a touch of kirsch, giving it a bit of flamboyance, too much for some, just
fine for others. The tannins
moderate and the mid-palate thins a bit with air, my biggest quibble, but
this remains a rather sexy wine that deliver intense flavors. The
alcohol comes in at 14.5%. There were 500 cases produced. The suggested
retail price is $30.00. 88 points.
2006 Syrah "Estate" (Clos LaChance)
The Syrah is classic Syrah, a bit gamey on the finish, with an elegant if
lushly textured mid-palate, and intensity on the nice finish. This holds
nicely with air and continues to develop some character. Of the three wines
reviewed here from Clos LaChance, this probably held best when aired out. By
a small margin, it was my favorite.
There were 489 cases produced. The suggested retail price is $35.00. 88
points.
2006 Lila's Cuvée (Clos LaChance)
This is a blend of
40% Grenache, 20% Syrah, 15% Carignane, 15% Alicante Bouchet, and 5% each of
Cinsault and Petite Sirah. It is rather modest in the mid-palate, with a
lush texture thanks to the oak, which gives the wine a bit of a vanilla
finish. There is good red fruit flavor popping through on the finish,
though, as the oak does not obliterate it. The tannins are ripe and well
integrated, just popping up a little on the finish, enough to give the wine
some needed verve at first, but increasingly powerful with air, and then
moderating quickly. The aromatics on the wine are lovely. A nice early
effort, it is a flavorful and rather suave wine, although it finishes a bit
short and it is a bit underwhelming for its price category. There were
255 cases produced. The suggested retail price is $40.00. 87 points.
Dessert/Sparkling
NV Port "40 Year" (Taylor Fladgate)
This has some of the acid and nuts that you'd expect in a 40 year
Port, but there is fruit here, too, along with a succulent finish that
dribbled sugar and flavor over the palate. It is a lovely Port, sweet and
delicious, while retaining its verve and energy. 92 points.
1998 Riesling Eiswein "Mussbacher Eselshaut" (Muller-Catoir)
With some age, this has come along nicely. It was quite subtle in its youth,
not terribly remarkable for a pricey half bottle. Its color is darker now,
and the richness of the wine is more obvious, even while the sweetness is
restrained. It is a wine that grows on you with air and warmth, delivering
delicious, apricot-tinged fruit to the palate, seeming riper, but not
necessarily sweeter, as it airs out. It should hold beautifully
for many more years. 93 points.
Germany
(except
dessert/sparkling)
2005 Riesling Spatlese "Scharzhofberger" (Vereinigte Hospitien)
QPR Winner
This is a charming, beautifully balanced presentation, off dry,
with mineral nuances prominent as it airs out. It is not particularly intense,
modest in acid and sugar, but well focused, gentle and quite appealing. 89
points.
Rhone/South/SW
France
(except
dessert/sparkling)
2000 Chateauneuf-du-Pape "Celestins" (Bonneau)
One of the things I've most admired about this bottling is its
backbone and structure, a Chateauneuf that can be counted on to age, with some
power and precision, not just---that's not JUST---tasty fruit. This year is a
big disappointment by those standards. The wine is soft and plump, seamless,
with little verve, no discernible tannins and a far too laid back demeanor. It
is pretty tasty, to be sure, but by the standards of this winery and this
bottling, it seems a bit flabby and uninspiring. 90 points.
Spain
(except
dessert/sparkling)
2005 Peraj Ha'abib "Flor de Primavera" (Celler de Capçanes)
This wine from Montsant is a blend of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache
(35% each), with 30% Carignan. It is a pretty nice offering from this well
known winery. It opens with a trace of sweet oak on the finish, but this is
not about the oak. There is a delicate mid-palate followed by considerable
power on the finish. This is a wine with a tannic punch at the outset. The
fruit eventually takes over, initially dominated by the Cabernet, later
showing more Grenache flavors. Delicious, graceful and gripping, this has
many virtues and a chance to cellar well. It
sometimes showed the potential to develop some complexity over the next few
years. If I had a quibble, it did seem to flatten and
turn a bit austere with a couple of hours of air. On other wines, that would
not be much of a flaw, but given that this is obviously constructed to age
and intended to be something serious, it needs to prove itself in the cellar
to merit its rating. Suggested retail on this is $60.00. This is the Kosher cuvée, but don't let that concern you. It's just wine, and pretty good wine
at that. 90 points.
![]()
QPR Winner
I
give this award to wines that are particularly good values, even
if well beyond bargain wine pricing. They are not "best
buys," which I define as under $20 wines. Every Best
Buy is a QPR winner, but the reverse is not true.
Note:
wines tasted at trade shows and the like generally will be displayed with
ranges, as it is more difficult to get a good read on a wine
in those conditions. Also, many notes on the E-Zine often come from food
and wine events, rather than classic, controlled conditions.
This site
designed and created in content and in form by Mark Squires, copyright ©
2009, all rights reserved.
TM
is a registered trademark of Mark Squires